This past Wednesday I attended a
lecture entitled Extra-Ordinary Experiences and the Emergence of New Visionary
Movements-Mormonism and the Golden Plates by Ann Taves for a diversity event. I thought that this would be an interesting
talk for a couple different reasons. The
first was that I had a Mormon friend in high school and the second was that I
like to learn about different religions.
So, around 7:30 I headed to the MU
without thinking since all the other talks I have attended have been
there. Soon I realized that this was
wrong and after a few confused minutes I quickly headed to the Sceman Building. Apparently I need to learn to read a bit
better. OOPS!
Unfortunately, I was disappointed
in this lecture. I guess I went into the
lecture thinking that there would be some explanation of the core beliefs of
Mormonism and the significance of the Golden Plates. Instead, the main topic had more to do with
whether or not the Golden Plates actually existed or if they were a delusion. Dr. Taves went into some philosophical reasoning
which I find really hard to follow. In
addition to it being hard for me to follow, it was a very dry talk in
general. It was clear that Dr. Taves
knew what she was talking about, but I think she had a harder time connecting
with the audience. I found myself
watching the American Sign Language interpreters most of the times while still
listening to Dr. Taves speak.
This has been the first talk that I can
honestly say that I did not enjoy at all.
Yet, I still am walking away with something and that is the motivation to
take some time an research Mormonism on my own to satisfy my curiosity. I think it is important to at least be
familiar with different religions and that is what I try to do. I find that learning about other religions
allows me to examine my beliefs and to decide how happy I am with them.
Bummer! That stinks that it wasn't a great talk. I hope that's the only one you ever go to that isn't interesting! :)
ReplyDelete